Communicator - The Online Destination for Electronic Journalists


Ethics Question: Should Facebook Posts Be Quoted Without Permission?
Print Story

Jan 26 2012

By Vince Duffy, RTDNA Chairman-Elect

You know those really funny replies you leave beneath your friends Facebook posts?

You know the comments I’m talking about, the really snarky ones that have lots of “likes” and “LOLs”?

Those comments that show your friends you should really be working for The Daily Show, not some stuffy NPR outlet?

OK, maybe that’s just me. But how would you like to see any of the comments you leave on your friend’s Facebook page show up the next day on the front page of the newspaper, as a quote, attributed to you?

Two separate incidents last week raised this question for me.

In the first incident, a woman on a Detroit area Facebook page created for local journalists asked what odd jobs people held before becoming journalists? (That assumes, of course, that journalism is not and odd job.)  Lots of folks chimed in with amusing career choices. I revealed my successful stints as a club DJ and a residential real estate photographer.

A participant on the page suggested it would be a great idea to compile this information for an amusing story about jobs local journalists had in the past. “Absolutely not!” was the rather unanimous refrain from the crowd. People were happy to share their embarrassing stories among friends and colleagues on the Facebook page, but didn’t want it available to everyone. (The article ended up not being written.)

The second incident did find people reading their own comments back to themselves in the newspaper. It began when a longtime spokesman of a medium-sized Midwestern city announced on his Facebook page that he had resigned.

As the hometown newspaper described it in print the next day, “Within minutes, he had a few dozen replies wishing him well, including several from current and former journalists he worked with during his spokesman years.”

The article then went on to quote the current and former journalists, not from interviews with those individuals, but just pulling their comments off the Facebook page.

The reporter did make it clear that the quotes came from a Facebook page, but I’m not aware that any of the quoted individuals were asked permission for their words to be used. Sure it’s legal, but I wondered if it was ethical?

I don’t know about you, but I sure wouldn’t want all the things I’ve said on Facebook to be published next to my name in the paper. Some of the things I’ve written can only be understood in a context shared by people who know me well. Others comments are sarcastic or written to make people laugh. Do we now have to worry about being quasi-public figures whose every Facebook musing is possible news material?

I discussed this with some journalist friends and the opinions were divided.

One woman said (and yes, she was warned I would quote her) – “In my view, quoting a published comment (from Facebook) is no different than quoting an author or writer of prose, poetry and the like. We do THAT all the time, and rarely ask the author for their permission!”

Another reporter disagreed – “With very few exceptions, I do not believe Facebook pages should be used for quotes without confirming the source of the comment and the context. It’s so easy to hack, impersonate or assume someone's identity on Facebook that I just wouldn't trust an unverified quote. To me this would be similar to quoting the bumper stickers on someone's car - yes, it is public, but how do you know who put it there or why?”

One of the reporters who had his Facebook post published summed up the discussion well when he said, “It raises questions of privacy and courtesy, but the main problem is that it’s lazy.”



 

Comments
Facebook Post Raises Interesting Questions

Your post raises some very interesting questions, Vince. Ones I have struggled with professionally as a reporter and personally as a blogger (especially in this post: http://necessarypleasures.blogspot.com/2011/04/family-faith-and-hackers.html)

I can appreciate that we don\'t want to have to be running around making \"this is off the record\" disclaimers everywhere; but I have to agree with your friend who says it\'s fair game if it\'s in \"the public square\".

By Tanya Ott on Jan 26 2012
Facebook Comments

It's public so it's fair game, which is why we should all be more careful about what we write on Facebook and Twitter... and public comment pages.

By Beth Whisman on Jan 26 2012
Facebook Comments

Anyone, especially journalists, should know that when you write something on Facebook and other social media forums, your comments could come back to haunt you. I agree journalists should take great care when sourcing their material and make an effort to obtain permission -- but as you well know that doesn't always happen. It's a good topic for dicussion.

By Mike Snuffer on Jan 26 2012
Should FB Posts Go Public?

It seems to me that if we don't want to end up seeing our words in print, we simply shouldn't type them.

By Handyman Bob on Jan 27 2012
Posting to social media

A tweet from a reporter that discussed hooking up a friend with a companion, acting as the intermediary sparked a discussion in our newsroom. We all agreed it was dangerous and inappropriate, as well as unprofessional.

By Jon McCrary on Jan 28 2012


Is it OK for journalists to publicly share (on Facebook or Twitter, for example) their views on Obama's support for gay marriage?

  POST YOUR THOUGHTS
recent posts most viewed recent tags